Links to relevant blogs are coming soon. In
the mean time, read this interesting article from an American student
and visionary, Sam Rosen.
A
Radical Distinction: “Being the Change” vs. “Doing the Change”
by Sam Rosen, Philadelphia, PA, USA
by Sam Rosen, Philadelphia, PA, USA
As Gandhi wisely intuited, “who” one is—values, beliefs, character, integrity, vision—matters a great deal in the process of change. Indeed, unless one has reached a certain level of internal development, authentic change rarely occurs; put differently, structural transformation always begins from within. Yet most of us miss the true point of Gandhi’s words: Doing means nothing without being, and being means nothing without doing. We discover, explore, and enhance our inner maps through action, and the results of our actions provide a gauge for how we must change internally. This virtuous cycle becomes a self-perpetuating feedback loop in which being and doing facilitate positive evolution, both within and without.
If one accepts that the
world does indeed need change, then the challenge becomes how to enact
change in the face of great adversity and conflict. If one says “I
care about the world,” or “The future matters,” then one must not
only create the internal belief systems that align with such statements,
but also take consistent, applied action steps to bring about that
change. Many feel uncomfortable with this concept. The objection one
hears most often is, “But most people do think that they’re doing
the change the world needs done. Hitler thought he was doing the change
the world needed done.”
This is where one must
inject some degree of “objective truth,” or common principles that
all humans hold dear. One can derive these truths scientifically. For
instance, Amartya Sen, the Nobel Prize-winning economist, has said that
democracy is a “universal value.” That is, if the given the option,
the great majority of individuals—and nearly all of those whose
everyday actions reflect values of cooperation, mutual respect, and
compassion—would choose democracy over totalitarianism or feudalism.
Similarly, most would choose environment sustainability over
destruction, education over ignorance, material wealth over abject
poverty, health over sickness, and cooperation over conflict.
Thus, in this context, a
natural moral hierarchy does emerge, based on shared values of human
emergence and sustainability. One must “be” a force for good—an
absolute, not relative, good—by “doing” what matters most to the
world. Contrary to what some might think, conflict does not subside; in
some cases, it may intensify markedly. Indeed, the battle over abortion
will likely continue for decades, if not eternity. Yet on issues such as
racism, equity of opportunity, and freedom, most Americans can find
consensus on outcomes, even if they dispute the means.
The challenge, then, is
to avoid getting stuck in “being” the change. “Doing” the change
requires immeasurable personal responsibility, accountability to our
entire country, not to mention the global community, and an unwavering
commitment to personal and cultural development. Hardest of all, doing
the change requires that we transcend our postmodern values in pursuit
of the next great Truth, the next Enlightenment. Voltaire cried,
“Remember the cruelties!”
Yet the divine ordination
and mythic gods against which Voltaire fought have merely taken the form
of a more subtle postmodern relativism. Indeed, our era has been cruel
to many. Our apathy, our relativism, our self-absorption—they have
left us in a mess.
We are in a chaos state.
Partisanship and terrorism threaten domestic and global stability. This
is, in short, a time of evolutionary change. And the only way to
transition from chaos to reorganization is through activity. “Being”
is not enough. Perhaps we know that societal change often entails
revolutionary social upheaval, so we would rather practice Yoga
superficially, experience nervous breakdowns about whether to buy Prada
or Gucci, and live “the good life” than create the next paradigm.
It’s easier that way. Yet some of us, those who care deeply about the
world, must overcome the apathy present in today’s world and co-create
the transformation necessary to restore
America
as a beacon of hope. When British monarchy oppressed the world,
America
revolted. “No taxation without representation!” we shouted. When the
world accepted slavery as a justifiable and necessary institution,
Abraham Lincoln said, “As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a
master. This expresses my idea of democracy.” When the apartheid
clause of “separate but equal” violently oppressed minorities, we
sang, “We shall overcome.”
We have lost faith in
what we must overcome. We must find that faith once again and come
together as a nation, not to celebrate the unblemished success of
democracy, but because our future is at risk. We must rediscover our
moral values and stand for them. And this, above all, requires both deep
contemplation and evolutionary action—a marriage of being and doing.
As Martin Luther King, Jr., famously said, “The ultimate measure of a
man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but
where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.” The challenge,
the controversy stares us in the eye daily, yet we cling desperately to
comfort and convenience. It is time for a new revolution, one based on
hope and democracy. It is time to join hands and make
America
shine once again.